|
 |

Date of event: |
02 February 2005. |
Location & aircraft: |
New Zealand, 8 km north-east of Taupo Aerodrome. Piper PA34-200T Seneca II (ZK-FMW). |
Human Factors: |
No obvious cause for
the accident could be determined. Autopsy reports showed the pilot had consumed cannabis, probably between 12 and 24 hours
before the accident. While cannabis can adversely affect a person's ability to operate an aircraft, its effects can vary greatly
so this could not be conclusively identified as a cause of this accident. Safety issues identified included: The lack of a
test regime to identify the use of illicit drugs and alcohol in the transport industry; Inadequate medical standards for pilots
with an aortic valve replacement; The urgent need to have terrain awareness warning systems installed in Part 135 aircraft. |
Brief description of event: |
On Wednesday 2 February
2005, ZK-FMW, a Piper PA34-200T Seneca, was on an air transport charter flight from Ardmore
to Taupo with a pilot and 2 passengers on board. During the instrument approach to Taupo Aerodrome the aircraft deviated left
of the published final approach track and at 1154 struck Mount
Tauhara, 8 km from the aerodrome. The 3 occupants were killed on impact
and the aircraft was destroyed. |
Injury profile: |
|
Total on board |
Fatal injuries |
Serious injuries |
Minor injuries |
Uninjured |
Injury severity not known |
Crew: |
1 |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Passengers: |
2 |
2 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Aircraft total: |
3 |
3 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Ground: |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Resources & references: |
|
Date of event: |
22 November 2004. |
Location & aircraft: |
Malaysia,
Pontianak, Borneo. Boeing 737-500 (Flight GA501). |
Human Factors: |
Copilot landed aircraft
as pilot suffered heart attack. |
Brief description of event: |
The pilot of a Garuda
Indonesia Airlines Boeing 737 collapsed at the controls, minutes after take-off from Pontianak,
on the island of Borneo, forcing his copilot
to take the controls and make an unassisted landing back at the airport in Borneo, according
to local news reports. None of the 107 passengers on board was hurt. |
Injury profile: |
|
Total on board |
Fatal injuries |
Serious injuries |
Minor injuries |
Uninjured |
Injury severity not known |
Crew: |
7 |
1 |
- |
- |
6 |
- |
Passengers: |
107 |
- |
- |
- |
107 |
- |
Aircraft total: |
114 |
1 |
- |
- |
113 |
- |
Ground: |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Resources & references: |
|
|
 |

Date of event: |
23 October 2004. |
Location & aircraft: |
New Zealand,
Omihi Station, North Canterbury. Cessna A188 Agwagon (ZK-CSM). |
Human Factors: |
The post-mortem report,
when read in conjunction with the evidence gathered during the accident investigation, provides grounds to conclude that the
pilot suffered a medical incapacitating cardiac event that rendered him unable to maintain control of his aircraft.Post-mortem
examination found that the pilot had sustained fatal injuries associated with a high-energy impact. Also discovered was "profound
pulmonary oedema and evidence of a component of chronic congestive heart failure". The pathologist explained in his report:
"while the pulmonary oedema might in part or entirely represent neurogenic pulmonary oedema in response to head injury, the
time course is very short. I prefer the interpretation that there has been an acute cardiac event, most likely cardiac arrhythmia,
resulting in sudden onset (acute), severe congestive cardiac failure prior to impact. Such an event would likely render him
incapable of control of the aircraft in the take off run".In light of the fact that no medical certificate record could be
found for the periods of December 2002 to 11 June 2003 and December 2003 to 16 June 2004 it appears that the pilot may have
operated his aircraft for hire and reward without a current Class 1 medical certificate for two periods of 6 months within
the 2 years and 3 months preceding the accident.Although the pilot had a current medical certificate at the time of the accident,
accurate medical assessment of the pilot for risk of an incapacitating cardiac event was not possible, as the pilot had declared
on his medical certificate application that he was a non-smoker. The accurate assessment of pilot cardiovascular risk depends
on complete information being made available to the CAA medical examiners. Whether or not an applicant for a CAA medical certificate
smokes cigarettes is an important factor in the calculation of cardiovascular risk. When an applicant's cardiovascular risk
exceeds a certain level further investigations, usually an exercise stress electrocardiogram (stress ECG), are undertaken
to exclude the presence of reversible myocardial ischaemia. Had the pilot declared,at the time of his most recent medical
certification application in June 2004, that he had continued smoking he would have been required to undertake a stress ECG.
While it may not have been conclusive in predicting the risk of an in-flight incapacitation, a stress ECG may have identified
significant cardiac disease. |
Brief description of event: |
The Civil Aviation
Authority was notified of the accident at 1800 hours on Saturday 23 October 2004. The Transport Accident Investigation Commission
was in turn notified shortly thereafter but declined to investigate. A CAA site investigation was commenced the next day.
The pilot was conducting an agricultural operation engaged in spreading solid fertiliser in suspension with water. The pilot
appeared to commence his take off normally and continue out of line of sight of the ground crew, who were alerted to the accident
by smoke coming from the direction of the end of the sloping airstrip. The first persons on the scene found that the aircraft
was on fire and could see no signs of life. |
Injury profile: |
|
Total on board |
Fatal injuries |
Serious injuries |
Minor injuries |
Uninjured |
Injury severity not known |
Crew: |
1 |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Passengers: |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Aircraft total: |
1 |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Ground: |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Resources & references: |
|
Date of event: |
01 October 2003. |
Location & aircraft: |
Australia, 1 km WSW Mareeba Aerodrome, West of Cairns, QLD. PA-23-250 Aztec (VH-WAC). |
Human Factors: |
The reason for the
loss of control could not be conclusively established, however the circumstances of the accident and the available evidence
was consistent with pilot incapacitation associated with coronary artery disease. Post-mortem examination of the pilot, who
held a valid medical certificate, identified significant narrowing of the coronary arteries. |
Brief description of event: |
The pilot, his wife
and three children were conducting a private flight from Mareeba, to Roma,
Queensland, in the Piper Aztec aircraft, registered VH-WAC. Witnesses reported
that shortly after the aircraft took off from runway 28, it started to bank to the left. The left bank gradually steepened,
after which the aircraft rapidly descended to the ground. Witnesses close to the aerodrome described engine noises consistent
with normal operation. The aircraft was destroyed by impact forces and post-impact fire. |
Injury profile: |
|
Total on board |
Fatal injuries |
Serious injuries |
Minor injuries |
Uninjured |
Injury severity not known |
Crew: |
1 |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Passengers: |
4 |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Aircraft total: |
5 |
5 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Ground: |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Resources & references: |
|
Date of event: |
30 April 2000. |
Location & aircraft: |
New Zealand, Napier. Bantam microlight (ZK-TKF). |
Human Factors: |
Post-mortem examination
determined that death was due to ischaemic heart disease. |
Brief description of event: |
The Bantam microlight
was on a dual training exercise to the west of Napier. After practising forced landings, the pilot and instructor decided
to return to Napier. On the return flight, the student noticed that the instructor appeared to be unconcious, and was unable
to obtain a response from him. The student reported the situation to Napier
Tower, and emergency services were called to meet the aircraft. The student
landed the aircraft, and after examination by emergency services personnel, it was found that the instructor had died in flight. |
Injury profile: |
|
Total on board |
Fatal injuries |
Serious injuries |
Minor injuries |
Uninjured |
Injury severity not known |
Crew: |
1 |
1 |
- |
- |
1 |
- |
Passengers: |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Aircraft total: |
2 |
1 |
- |
- |
1 |
- |
Ground: |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Resources & references: |
|

Date of event: |
02 April 1999. |
Location & aircraft: |
New Zealand,
Rowallan Forest,
near Tuatapere, Southland. Aerospatiale AS
350B (ZK-HBH). |
Human Factors: |
The cause of the loss
of control was not conclusively established, but the pilot's ability to control the helicopter may have been medically impaired
by the sudden onset of a cardiac event. |
Brief description of event: |
On Good Friday the
aircraft was on a charter flight from Clifden, carrying a hunting party into Fiordland when some loss of control occurred.
The helicopter collided with trees and the ground in the Rowallan
Forest, killing all five occupants. |
Injury profile: |
|
Total on board |
Fatal injuries |
Serious injuries |
Minor injuries |
Uninjured |
Injury severity not known |
Crew: |
1 |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Passengers: |
4 |
4 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Aircraft total: |
5 |
5 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Ground: |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Resources & references: |
1. |
Accident
or Incident Report (New Zealand Transport
Accident Investigation Commi): TAIC 99-003. |
2. |
Accident
or Incident Report (New Zealand Civil
Aviation Authority): Accident Brief 99/768. |
|
Date of event: |
26 April 1998. |
Location & aircraft: |
Australia, 16 km W Eucumbene, NSW. Cessna 210R (VH-IOR). |
Human Factors: |
The possibility of
pilot incapacitation cannot be excluded as a contributing factor in the occurrence. The reported operation of the aircraft
engine to the point of impact, together with the uncontrolled nature of the descent, indicates that there had been no effective
response initiated to counter the rapid descent of the aircraft. Although this testing (stress electrocardiogram) did not
return an abnormal result, post-mortem examination of the pilot did reveal that he was suffering severe coronary artery disease.
The examining pathologist commented that the stress associated with operating the aircraft in difficult weather conditions
could have precipitated a sudden deterioration in his cardiac condition, possibly resulting in a sudden medical incapacitation.
|
Brief description of event: |
The planned route was
over mountainous terrain, in adverse weather conditions, and at an altitude above the forecast freezing level. Moderate to
severe turbulence had been forecast in the vicinity of the Snowy
Mountain ranges and the meteorological conditions were conducive to the
formation of mountain waves. At the time radar contact with the aircraft was lost, the pilot was attempting to climb the aircraft
to an altitude of 10,000 ft and appeared to be flying it at a lower than normal climb speed. The reason for the observed loss
of climb performance as the aircraft approached 9,000 ft could not be positively determined. The aircraft impacted the ground
in an attitude consistent with a loss of control. |
Injury profile: |
|
Total on board |
Fatal injuries |
Serious injuries |
Minor injuries |
Uninjured |
Injury severity not known |
Crew: |
1 |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Passengers: |
5 |
5 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Aircraft total: |
5 |
6 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Ground: |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Resources & references: |
|
Accident
or Incident Report (Australian Transport Safety Bureau): ATSB 199801415. |
|
|
 |

Date of event: |
06 June 2003. |
Location & aircraft: |
New Zealand,
1.2 nm shot of runway at Christchurch. Piper PA 31-350 Navajo
Chieftain (ZK-NCA). |
Human Factors: |
Safety issues identified
by the accident investigation included: The desirability of adoption of TAWS equipment for smaller IFR air transport aircraft;
The need for VFR/IFR operators to have practical procedures for observing cellphone rules during flight; The need for pilots
on single-pilot IFR operations to use optimum procedures during instrument approaches.Other matters inquired-upon during the
subsequent coronial inquest included cardiovascular risk assessment, and the use of over-the-counter reading spectacles by
pilots. |
Brief description of event: |
On Friday 6 June 2003,
Air Adventures New Zealand Limited Piper PA 31-350 Navajo Chieftain aeroplane ZK-NCA, was on an air transport charter flight
from Palmerston North to Christchurch with one pilot and 9
passengers. At 1907 it was on an instrument approach to Christchurch Aerodrome at night in instrument meteorological conditions
when it descended below minimum altitude, in a position where reduced visibility prevented runway or approach lights from
being seen, to collide with trees and terrain 1.2 nm short of the runway. The pilot and 7 passengers were killed, and 2 passengers
received serious injury. The aircraft was destroyed. |
Injury profile: |
|
Total on board |
Fatal injuries |
Serious injuries |
Minor injuries |
Uninjured |
Injury severity not known |
Crew: |
1 |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Passengers: |
9 |
7 |
2 |
- |
- |
- |
Aircraft total: |
10 |
8 |
2 |
- |
- |
- |
Ground: |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Resources & references: |
1. |
Accident or Incident
Report (New Zealand Transport Accident Investigation Commi): TAIC report 03-004. |
2. |
Accident or Incident
Report (Christchurch Coroner's Court inquest): . |
|
Date of event: |
24 November 2000. |
Location & aircraft: |
Australia, 53 km NE Oakey, Aero, Queensland (QLD). Amateur Built Aircraft RV-6A (ZK-VBC). |
Human Factors: |
Specialist medical
opinion was that the possibility of the pilot suffering a heart attack induced by high stress levels after the propeller failed
could not be excluded. |
Brief description of event: |
The owner/builder of
the the Vans RV-6A aircraft was conducting a flight from Townsville to Toowoomba. The aircraft departed Townsville at 0846
local time. The pilot subsequently contacted Oakey Approach at 1324, and the aircraft was identified on radar at 3500 feet.
The pilot was instructed to maintain that altitude. When the aircraft was about 26 nautical miles from Toowoomba, the pilot
transmitted a mayday distress message stating that the aircraft's engine had failed. A short time later he reported that a
propeller blade had failed. No further transmissions were heard from the aircraft. About 30 minutes later, a searching helicopter
located the wreckage in a flat clear area amongst hilly, tree covered terrain. |
Injury profile: |
|
Total on board |
Fatal injuries |
Serious injuries |
Minor injuries |
Uninjured |
Injury severity not known |
Crew: |
1 |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Passengers: |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Aircraft total: |
1 |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Ground: |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Resources & references: |
|

Date of event: |
12 September 2000. |
Location & aircraft: |
Australia, 9 km NW Inverell Aero, NSW. Cessna A152 (VH-ADU). |
Human Factors: |
The reason for the
loss of control of the aircraft could not be positively established. Pilot incapacitation leading to a loss of control was
a likely factor. Due to his medical condition, the pilot might have suffered a coughing fit in flight that impaired his ability
to fly the aircraft. Alternatively, the concentration of doxylamine in his system might have led to drowsiness or even disorientation
associated with aerobatic manoeuvres. Other possible reasons for a loss of control of the aircraft include pilot incapacitation
for some other reason, and loss of consciousness, or partial loss of consciousness, due to the onset of g loadings when conducting
an aerobatic manoeuvre. |
Brief description of event: |
The Cessna A152 Aerobat
aircraft was engaged on an aerobatics training flight with the pilot the sole occupant of the aircraft. The pilot was practising
for an aerobatic competition and had been having problems conducting stall turn manoeuvres. Before the accident flight, the
pilot had completed an aerobatic practice flight with an instructor. The pilot then decided to fly a solo flight to practise
stall turns without the effect of a second person's weight on aircraft performance in aerobatic manoeuvres. He then intended
to practise his full aerobatic sequence, which the instructor later stated was well within the pilot's capabilities. Between
flights the pilot refuelled the aircraft and consumed a bottle of soft drink. After takeoff for the solo flight, the pilot
discussed with his instructor by radio, his intentions for the flight and the criticisms of his manoeuvres during the dual
flight. The instructor later reported that during the discussion, everything concerning the pilot and the aircraft seemed
normal. Witnesses some distance away heard the aircraft fly over. They later heard a thump and noticed smoke rising from the
same direction as the source of the sound. There were no witnesses to the impact. |
Injury profile: |
|
Total on board |
Fatal injuries |
Serious injuries |
Minor injuries |
Uninjured |
Injury severity not known |
Crew: |
1 |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Passengers: |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Aircraft total: |
1 |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Ground: |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Resources & references: |
|
Accident
or Incident Report (Australian Transport Safety Bureau): ATSB 200004191. |
|
Date of event: |
02 April 1999. |
Location & aircraft: |
New Zealand,
Rowallan Forest.
Aerospatiale AS 350B (ZK-HBH).
|
Human Factors: |
The cause of the loss
of control was not conclusively established, but the pilot's ability to control the helicopter may have been medically impaired
by the sudden onset of a cardiac event. |
Brief description of event: |
On Good Friday the
aircraft was on a charter flight from Clifden, carrying a hunting party into Fiordland when some loss of control occurred.
The helicopter collided with trees and the ground in the Rowallan
Forest, killing all 5 occupants. |
Injury profile: |
|
Total on board |
Fatal injuries |
Serious injuries |
Minor injuries |
Uninjured |
Injury severity not known |
Crew: |
1 |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Passengers: |
4 |
4 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Aircraft total: |
5 |
5 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Ground: |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Resources & references: |
1. |
Accident
or Incident Report (New Zealand Transport
Accident Investigation Commi): TAIC 99-003.. |
2. |
Aircraft
accident website (PlaneCrashInfo.com): Accident details. |
|
Date of event: |
04 January 1999. |
Location & aircraft: |
New Zealand, Maramarua. Schempp-Hirth Ventus B/16.6 (ZK-GTR). |
Human Factors: |
A post-mortem examination
of the pilot found severe coronary artery disease, which probably resulted in an in-flight incapacitation and loss of control.
No indication was found of any pre-impact aircraft defect. |
Brief description of event: |
The glider was on a
club-contest task that comprised two laps of a triangular course originating from, and terminating at, Drury. On the fourth
leg, the glider was in company with two other aircraft, but near Maramarua the 59 year old male pilot reported that he was
going to land. He did not, however, give any reason for his intention to land. A ground witness observed the glider pitch
up from level flight and enter a steep nose-down spiral from which it did not recover before striking the ground. |
Injury profile: |
|
Total on board |
Fatal injuries |
Serious injuries |
Minor injuries |
Uninjured |
Injury severity not known |
Crew: |
1 |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Passengers: |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Aircraft total: |
1 |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Ground: |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Resources & references: |
|

Date of event: |
24 August 1996. |
Location & aircraft: |
New Zealand,
8 km South of New Plymouth. Jodel D11 (ZK-EJP). |
Human Factors: |
The pilot had a known
medical deficiency, evidenced by severe coronary artery disease, which invalidated his CAA Medical Certificate. Pilot impairment
or distraction as a result of the deficiency was a possible contributory factor in the accident. |
Brief description of event: |
At about 1040 hours,
at the conclusion of a local flight, the aircraft made an approach and go-around over the farm airstrip where it was based.
The aircraft subsequently flew downward at a lower height than usual and was seen to bank steeply to the left in an apparent
attempt to land on the airstrip or in adjacent paddocks. It levelled momentarily then rolled to the right, descended rapidly,
and struck the hillside. The pilot sustained fatal injuries on impact. The injured passenger escaped from the burning wreckage
and was assisted to safety by farm workers who had observed the accident. |
Injury profile: |
|
Total on board |
Fatal injuries |
Serious injuries |
Minor injuries |
Uninjured |
Injury severity not known |
Crew: |
1 |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Passengers: |
1 |
- |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
Aircraft total: |
2 |
1 |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
Ground: |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Resources & references: |
|
Accident
or Incident Report (New Zealand Transport
Accident Investigation Commi): TAIC 96-017. |
|
Crew incapacitation - Busselton Aerodrome, WA, 13 February 2007, VH-SQF, Beech Aircraft Corporation 58 Baron |
| Occurrence Details
Occurrence Number: |
200700765 |
Location: |
Busselton |
Occurrence Date: |
13 February 2007 |
State: |
WA |
Occurrence Time: |
1830 WST |
Highest Injury Level: |
None |
Occurrence Category: |
Serious Incident |
Investigation Type: |
Occurrence Investigation |
Occurrence Class: |
Operational |
Investigation Status: |
Completed |
Occurrence Type: |
Significant Event |
Release Date: |
15 April 2008 | Aircraft Details
Aircraft Manufacturer: |
Beech Aircraft Corp |
Aircraft Model: |
58 |
Aircraft Registration: |
VH-SQF |
Serial Number: |
TH-1560 |
Type of Operation: |
Flying Training |
Damage to Aircraft: |
Nil |
Departure Point: |
Jandakot, WA |
Departure Time: |
nk |
Destination: |
Jandakot, WA |
Crew Details: |
Role |
Class of Licence |
Hours on Type |
Hours Total |
|
Pilot-in-Command |
Commercial |
nk |
nk |
On 13 February 2007 at 1830 Western Daylight-saving Time, a Beech Aircraft Corporation 58 Baron was being used for instrument
flight training. The flight was being conducted under the visual flight rules (VFR), with the pilot flying, simulating flight
under the instrument flight rules (IFR). A second pilot was on board to act as a safety pilot and to lookout for other aircraft.
During the conduct of a Busselton, WA non-direction beacon (NDB) approach, the pilot flying became incapacitated and the safety
pilot assumed control of the Baron. The safety pilot landed the aircraft on runway 21 at Busselton and the incapacitated pilot
received treatment from attending ambulance officers. The pilot was a 22 year old, Grade 2 flying instructor, with 1,422 hours
total flying experience. Following a check by a Designated Aviation Medical Examiner and 4 days rest, the pilot was approved
to return to work.
The pilot stated that about 12 months previously, he had experienced a similar event and after a number of medical tests
that did not find any physical problems, it was established that he had been dehydrated.
Initial medical testing following the event found no health problems and it is possible that the pilot's sustenance and
fluid intake was inadequate. The pilot changed his eating and fluid intake habits, including using a water bottle while flying.
The Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) Aviation Medicine section subsequently suspended the pilot's Class 1 medical
and requested the pilot undergo further testing. That testing found that the pilot had epilepsy and CASA revoked the pilot's
medical.
|
 |
 |
 |
Date of event: |
24 August 1996. |
Location & aircraft: |
New Zealand,
Near New Plymouth. Jodel D11 (ZK-EJP). |
Human Factors: |
Possible incapacitation
of pilot (coronary artery disease) contributing to inadvertent stall. |
Brief description of event: |
At about 1040 hours,
on Saturday 24 August 1996, at the conclusion of a local flight, Jodel D11 ZK-EJP made an approach and go-around over the
farm airstrip where it was based. The aircraft subsequently flew downward at a lower height than usual and was seen to bank
steeply to the left in an apparent attempt to land on the airstrip or in adjacent paddocks. It levelled momentarily then rolled
to the right, descended rapidly, and struck the hillside. The pilot sustained fatal injuries on impact. The injured passenger
escaped from the burning wreckage and was assisted to safety by farm workers who had observed the accident.A loss of power
due to an undetermined engine malfunction and incapacitation of the pilot may have contributed to the inadvertent stall. Conditions
were conducive to carburettor icing. The pilot was probably medically unfit to fly. The pilot had a known medical deficiency,
evidenced by severe coronary artery disease, which invalidated his CAA Medical Certificate. Pilot impairment or distraction
as a result of the deficiency was a possible contributory factor in the accident. |
Injury profile: |
|
Total on board |
Fatal injuries |
Serious injuries |
Minor injuries |
Uninjured |
Injury severity not known |
Crew: |
1 |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Passengers: |
1 |
- |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
Aircraft total: |
2 |
1 |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
Ground: |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Resources & references: |
|
Accident
or Incident Report (New Zealand Transport
Accident Investigation Commi): TAIC 96-017. |
|
Date of event: |
01 November 1995. |
Location & aircraft: |
New Zealand, 18 nm North of Wairoa. Fletcher FU24-954 (ZK-EUG). |
Human Factors: |
In-flight incapacitation
of the pilot was identified as the probable cause. [As a result of the investigation of this and a previous similar accident
(see TAIC Report 95-010)] a safety recommendation pertaining to medical advice was made to the Aviation Industry Association. |
Brief description of event: |
The aircraft collided
with the terrain during topdressing operations on Rongoio Station, 18 nm north of Wairoa. An intense fire ensued and the pilot
lost his life in the accident. |
Injury profile: |
|
Total on board |
Fatal injuries |
Serious injuries |
Minor injuries |
Uninjured |
Injury severity not known |
Crew: |
1 |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Passengers: |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Aircraft total: |
1 |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Ground: |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Resources & references: |
|
Accident
or Incident Report (New Zealand Transport
Accident Investigation Commi): TAIC 95-018. |
|
Date of event: |
07 June 1995. |
Location & aircraft: |
New Zealand,
Near Lake Grassmere.
Fletcher FU 24A-954 (ZK-EMU). |
Human Factors: |
Pilot incapacitation
was the probable cause of this accident. The incapacitation was sufficient to cause loss of situational awareness and loss
of aircraft control at a critical phase of flight. (See also similar accident at TAIC Report 95-018) |
Brief description of event: |
At approximately 1100
hours on Wednesday 7 June 1995 a Fletcher FU24A-954, ZK-EMU, collided with the face of a hill during a sowing run and caught
fire. The aircraft was destroyed, and the pilot lost his life in the accident. Pilot incapacitation was the probable cause
of this accident. The incapacitation was sufficient to cause loss of situational awareness and loss of aircraft control at
a critical phase of flight. No safety issues were identified as a result of this investigation.[A subsequent investigation
95-018 resulted in reference to this accident 95-010, and a recommendation 007/96] |
Injury profile: |
|
Total on board |
Fatal injuries |
Serious injuries |
Minor injuries |
Uninjured |
Injury severity not known |
Crew: |
1 |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Passengers: |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Aircraft total: |
1 |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Ground: |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Resources & references: |
|
Date of event: |
14 April 1991. |
Location & aircraft: |
New Zealand, Near Warkworth. Rotec Rally 3 Microlight (ZK-WAC). |
Human Factors: |
The loss of control
which led to the accident was probably caused by medical incapacitation of the pilot during the flight. The pilot suffered
from a medical condition which could cause incapacitation. The pilot's medical condition was probably discoverable by medical
examination. The prescribed medical certification process did not result in detection of the pilot's medical condition. The
pathological report disclosed that the pilot had severe coronary artery disease. The pilot was overweight and being treated
for high blood pressure. |
Brief description of event: |
Possible in-flight
incapacitation of the pilot of Rotec Rally 3, microlight aircraft ZK-WAC near Warkworth on 14 April 1991. The safety issues
discussed are the maintenance of a minimum fabric strength on microlight aircraft and measures for improving the monitoring
of microlight pilots' fitness to fly. |
Injury profile: |
|
Total on board |
Fatal injuries |
Serious injuries |
Minor injuries |
Uninjured |
Injury severity not known |
Crew: |
1 |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Passengers: |
1 |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Aircraft total: |
2 |
2 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Ground: |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Resources & references: |
|
Accident
or Incident Report (New Zealand Transport
Accident Investigation Commi): TAIC 91-011. |
|
Date of event: |
12 June 1988. |
Location & aircraft: |
New Zealand,
In the sea near Beachlands, North Auckland
Province. Piper PA28-235 Cherokee (ZK-DBO). |
Human Factors: |
The probable cause
of the accident could not be determined although there was significant circumstantial evidence of a loss of control following
the sudden incapacitation of one of the front seat occupants. Post mortem examination of the pilot's coronary arteries revealed
severe narrowing due to atherosclerosis involving the left anterior descending artery and a diagonal branch of the left anterior
descending artery. There was approaching severe disease involving the left circumflex artery and moderate disease involving
the right coronary artery. No acute coronary lesions were evident and sections of the myocardium showed no scarring. |
Brief description of event: |
During a scenic flight
over Auckland City
at night, the pilot turned the aircraft around and headed it, unexpectedly, back towards the departure aerodrome. A short
time later the aircraft entered a steep dive which terminated in the sea. |
Injury profile: |
|
Total on board |
Fatal injuries |
Serious injuries |
Minor injuries |
Uninjured |
Injury severity not known |
Crew: |
1 |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Passengers: |
2 |
2 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Aircraft total: |
3 |
3 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Ground: |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Resources & references: |
|
Accident
or Incident Report (New Zealand Office
of Air Accidents Investigation,): OAAI 88-047 |
|
Date of event: |
31 March 1975. |
Location & aircraft: |
New Zealand,
Waimate, South Canterbury. DH82A Tiger MOth (ZK-AKH). |
Human Factors: |
The accident resulted
from a stall and ensuing steep dive from which recovery was not effected before the aircraft struck the ground. Both incurrence
of that stall and absence of visible indications of an attempt to recover from that dive by a pilot of the deceased'd considerable
experience strongly suggests that he suffered some form of physical incapacitation productive of loss of control.Autopsy established
that the pilot had died in the fire and had been in good health prior to the accident, with the exception of a moderately
advanced calcific stenosis of the aortic valve of the heart. That heart condition had been recognised during the pilot's medical
examination for private pilot licence renewals from 1968 onward but evaluation by the civil aviation medical staff, aided
by routine electrocardiogram readings, resulted in opinion that the pilot's heart condition provided no bar to his fitness
to fly as a private pilot. |
Brief description of event: |
During formation flying,
with another Tiger Moth, the aircraft was seen to drop slowly astern and to lose height. The aircraft subsequently stalled
and entered a steep dive from which it did not recover. |
Injury profile: |
|
Total on board |
Fatal injuries |
Serious injuries |
Minor injuries |
Uninjured |
Injury severity not known |
Crew: |
1 |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Passengers: |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Aircraft total: |
1 |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Ground: |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Resources & references: |
|
Accident
or Incident Report (New Zealand Office
of Air Accidents Investigation,): OAAI 75-047. |
|
Date of event: |
02 September 1974. |
Location & aircraft: |
New Zealand, Whitianga. Piper PA31 Navajo Chieftan (N54357). |
Human Factors: |
Autopsy of the pilot
revealed acute interstitial myocarditis conducive toward destruction of the cardiac muscle fibres. It is a silent disease
prone to cause irregularities in cardiac rhythm, fainting, and occasionally sudden death. The possibility that the pilot had
become physically incapacitated to some degree could not be entirely discounted. Probable cause: The pilot was unable to cope
with an in-flight emergency initiated by a powerplant malfunction and compounded by poor weather conditions, as a consequence
of which the aircraft stalled and the pilot lost control at too low an altitude to effect recovery. |
Brief description of event: |
Delivery flight from
US-based manufacturer to British owner. Pilot stopping-over in New Zealand
for several days. During take-off, for a flight from Whitianga to Auckland,
the aircraft suffered an engine failure and impacted vertically behind the beach at Whitianga. |
Injury profile: |
|
Total on board |
Fatal injuries |
Serious injuries |
Minor injuries |
Uninjured |
Injury severity not known |
Crew: |
1 |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Passengers: |
1 |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Aircraft total: |
2 |
2 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Ground: |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Resources & references: |
|
Accident or Incident
Report (New Zealand Office of Air Accidents
Investigation,): OAAI 74-097. |
|
Date of event: |
30 August 1972. |
Location & aircraft: |
New Zealand, Fairlie. Fletcher FU24 (ZK-CFQ). |
Human Factors: |
Autopsy disclosed a
coronary occlusion due to arteriosclerotic heart disease. It was felt that there were two possible causes: a heart attack
prior to or at the time of impact; and traumatic asphyxia.The accident was caused by loss of control (precipitated by circumstances
undetermined but in which the consequences of a coronary occlusion cannot be excluded) while the aircraft was in a steeply
banked attitude close to the ground. |
Brief description of event: |
The aircraft was ngaged
in an agricultural aviation operation and was seen making a sowing run above a valley floor. A few seconds later flames and
smoke were seen in the area where the aircraft had been working. Shortly afterward, the aircraft was found burning on a hillside
and its pilot apparently dead. |
Injury profile: |
|
Total on board |
Fatal injuries |
Serious injuries |
Minor injuries |
Uninjured |
Injury severity not known |
Crew: |
1 |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Passengers: |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Aircraft total: |
1 |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Ground: |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Resources & references: |
|
Accident
or Incident Report (New Zealand Office
of Air Accidents Investigation,): OAAI 72-077. |
|
Date of event: |
24 December 1970. |
Location & aircraft: |
New Zealand,
Waitemata Harbour.
Grumman G44 Widgeon (ZK-BAY). |
Human Factors: |
The accident was caused
by loss of control (resulting from an undetermined circumstance) while the aircraft was in a steeply banked turn and at a
height below regulation minimum safe height, which made recovery impossible before the aircraft struck the sea.Autopsy revealed
50% atheromatous occlusion of the left cronary artery, but no evidence of complete occlusion. Whether or not control loss
resulted from an attack of angina pectoris brought on by stress must accordingly remain a matter for conjecture and cannot
be eliminated entirely as a possible contributory factor. |
Brief description of event: |
The aircraft was carrying
a TV news team to photograph a launch burning on the harbour near Brown's Island. It alighted
near the launch and then taxied around it several times whil photographs were taken, then took off and made a low pass around
the vessel while further pictures were taken. It was then seen to climb away and return to make a steep right-hand turn around
the launch. During that turn, the aircraft's nose was observed to drop suddenly and the aircraft dived almost vertically into
the sea. All four occupants lost their lives. |
Injury profile: |
|
Total on board |
Fatal injuries |
Serious injuries |
Minor injuries |
Uninjured |
Injury severity not known |
Crew: |
1 |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Passengers: |
3 |
3 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Aircraft total: |
4 |
4 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Ground: |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Resources & references: |
|
Accident
or Incident Report (New Zealand Office
of Air Accidents Investigation,): OAAI 2185. |
|
Date of event: |
06 August 1966. |
Location & aircraft: |
Japan, Haneda International Airport,
Tokyo. DC-8, (PH-DCD). |
Human Factors: |
Pilot-in-command suddenly
collapsed due to coronary arteriosclerosis; co-pilot carried out landing. Coronary occlusion established on autopsy. |
Brief description of event: |
PIC (age 48) collapsed
while making visual final approach after trans-Pacific flight, but was restrained by shoulder harness. Flight engineer called
to COP, who took over at approximately 150 feet altitude to left of centreline of runway, executed overshoot and climbed to
3000 feet, where he changed to LH seat. After briefing crew, landed aircraft. PIC given all first-aid measures by cabin staff
but dead on landing. No accident resulted. |
Injury profile: |
|
Total on board |
Fatal injuries |
Serious injuries |
Minor injuries |
Uninjured |
Injury severity not known |
Crew: |
- |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Passengers: |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Aircraft total: |
- |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Ground: |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Resources & references: |
|
Date of event: |
21 October 1963. |
Location & aircraft: |
New Zealand,
Owhakatoro Station, Taneatua, Bay of Plenty.
Fletcher FU-24 (ZK-BIN). |
Human Factors: |
For reasons which have
not been determined, the aircraft struck the ground in the course of a steep diving turn. Loss of control consequent upon
physical incapacitation of the pilot appears to be the most likely cause. Investigation made into the pilot's background pointed
toward a recent state of nervous tension, and it was learned that he had confided to a few intimate friends that he "was not
happy about his heart". Post mortem examination revealed no evidence of CO contamination, and there appeared to be no abnormality
which could have caused sudden incapacity. |
Brief description of event: |
In the course of a
topdressing operation the aircraft was seen to make a steep diving turn to starboard which took it into the ground. Fire did
not occur. The pilot was killed instantly. |
Injury profile: |
|
Total on board |
Fatal injuries |
Serious injuries |
Minor injuries |
Uninjured |
Injury severity not known |
Crew: |
1 |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Passengers: |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Aircraft total: |
1 |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Ground: |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Resources & references: |
|
Accident
or Incident Report (New Zealand Accidents
Investigation Branch, Air De): AIB 25/3/1361. |
|
Date of event: |
21 October 1963. |
Location & aircraft: |
New Zealand,
Owhakatoro Station, Taneatua, Bay of Plenty.
Fletcher FU-24 (ZK-BIN). |
Human Factors: |
For reasons which have
not been determined, the aircraft struck the ground in the course of a steep diving turn. Loss of control consequent upon
physical incapacitation of the pilot appears to be the most likely cause. Investigation made into the pilot's background pointed
toward a recent state of nervous tension, and it was learned that he had confided to a few intimate friends that he "was not
happy about his heart". Post mortem examination revealed no evidence of CO contamination, and there appeared to be no abnormality
which could have caused sudden incapacity. |
Brief description of event: |
In the course of a
topdressing operation the aircraft was seen to make a steep diving turn to starboard which took it into the ground. Fire did
not occur. The pilot was killed instantly. |
Injury profile: |
|
Total on board |
Fatal injuries |
Serious injuries |
Minor injuries |
Uninjured |
Injury severity not known |
Crew: |
1 |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Passengers: |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Aircraft total: |
1 |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Ground: |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Resources & references: |
|
Accident
or Incident Report (New Zealand Accidents
Investigation Branch, Air De): AIB 25/3/1361. |
|
CEREBROVASCULAR)
Date of event: |
12 August 2005. |
Location & aircraft: |
Australia,
En-route (Auckland - Melbourne).
Boeing 767-338 ER (VH-OGP). |
Human Factors: |
The pilot reported
a history of stress-related difficulties over several years. He had received treatment for anxiety through a combination of
a stress management and medication, in the form of a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI). The pilot was also being
treated for hypertension. It is possible that the incapacitation of the PIC was related to an anxiety reaction precipitated
by a combination of factors including low blood pressure due to hypertension medication, fatigue and a head cold.The CASA
policy of granting medical certification to some private and commercial pilots and air traffic controllers who are taking
medication such as SSRIs differs from that of most other Civil Aviation Authorities. However, the approach taken by CASA is
in line with that recommended by the Aerospace Medical Association. In 2005, CASA published a safety evaluation of the policy.
The report concluded that the policy was appropriate and that there were no safety concerns relating to the practice. |
Brief description of event: |
The Boeing 767 aircraft
was conducting an international passenger flight from Auckland to Melbourne. During cruise the pilot in command (PIC) felt increasingly fatigued, and while
outside the flight deck his condition deteriorated. He felt shaky and nauseous, and had pain in the back of his head and neck.
He was administered oxygen by a member of the cabin crew. The PIC was relieved of duty and the flight continued to the destination
with the copilot at the controls. An alert phase was declared. After landing the PIC was taken to hospital for observation.
Subsequent tests proved inconclusive, but no evidence was found of a heart-related problem.
Injury profile: |
|
Total
on board |
Fatal
injuries |
Serious
injuries |
Minor
injuries |
Uninjured
|
Injury
severity not known |
Crew:
|
9
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
8
|
-
|
Passengers:
|
177
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
177
|
-
|
Aircraft
total: |
186
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
185
|
-
|
Ground:
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
Resources
& references: |
| |
Date: |
09 FEB 1982 |
Time: |
08:44 |
Type: |
McDonnell Douglas DC-8-61 |
Operator: |
Japan Air Lines - JAL |
Registration: |
JA8061 |
C/n / msn: |
45889/291 |
First flight: |
1967 |
Engines: |
4 Pratt & Whitney
JT3D- |
Crew: |
Fatalities: 0 / Occupants:
8 |
Passengers: |
Fatalities: 24 / Occupants:
166 |
Total: |
Fatalities: 24 / Occupants:
174 |
Airplane damage: |
Written off |
Location: |
Tokyo-Haneda Airport (HND) (Japan) |
Phase: |
Approach |
Nature: |
Domestic Scheduled
Passenger |
Departure airport: |
Fukuoka Airport (FUK/RJFF), Japan |
Destination airport: |
Tokyo-Haneda Airport (HND/RJTT), Japan |
Flightnumber: |
350 |
Narrative: JAL Flight
350 took off from Fukuoka (FUK) runway 16 at 07:34 for a regular flight to Tokyo-Haneda (HND). The aircraft climbed to the
cruising altitude of FL290. At 08:22 the crew started their descend to FL160. After reaching that altitude, they were cleared
to descend down to 3000 feet. The aircraft was cleared for a runway 33R ILS approach and 5deg of flaps were selected at 08:35,
followed by 25 degrees of flaps one minute later. The landing gear was lowered at 08:39 and 50 degrees of flaps were selected
two minutes after that. At 08:42 the aircraft descended through 1000 feet at an airspeed of 135 knots with wind from a direction
of 360deg at 20 knots. The co-pilot called out "500 feet" at 08:43:25 but the captain did not make the "stabilized" call-out
as specified by JAL operational regulations. The airspeed decreased to 133 knots as the aircraft descended through 300 feet
at 08:43:50 and the co-pilot warned the captain that the aircraft was approaching the decision height. At 08:43:56 the radio
altimeter warning sounded, followed by the flight engineer calling out "200 feet", which was the decision height, three seconds
later . At 08:44:01 the aircraft descended through 164 feet at 130KIAS. At that moment the captain cancelled autopilot, pushed
his controls forward and retarded the throttles to idle. The co-pilot tried to regain control but the aircraft crashed into
the shallow water of Tokyo Bay,
510m short of the runway 33R threshold. The nose and the right hand wing separated from the fuselage. The captain had recently
suffered a psychosomatic disorder; preliminary reports suggested that the captain experienced some form of a mental abberation.
He had been off duty from November 1980 to November 1981 for these reasons. Sources: » Aircraft Accident in Japan by SAKUMA Mitsuo
|
|
 |
 |
 |
Date of event: |
24 August 1996. |
Location & aircraft: |
New Zealand, 8 km south of New Plymouth. Jodel D.11 (ZK-EJP). |
Human Factors: |
The pilot was probably
medically unfit to fly. The pilot had a known medical deficiency, evidenced by severe coronary artery disease, which invalidated
his CAA Medical Certificate. Pilot impairment or distraction as a result of the deficiency was a possible contributory factor
in the accident. |
Brief description of event: |
At about 1040 hours,
on Saturday 24 August 1996, at the conclusion of a local flight, Jodel D11 ZK-EJP made an approach and go-around over the
farm airstrip where it was based. The aircraft subsequently flew downwind at a lower height than usual and was seen to bank
steeply to the left in an apparent attempt to land on the airstrip or in adjacent paddocks. It levelled momentarily, then
rolled to the right, descended rapidly, and struck the hillside. The pilot sustained fatal injuries on impact. The injured
passenger escaped from the burning wreckage and was assisted to safety by farm workers who had observed the accident. A loss
of power due to an undetermined engine malfunction and incapacitation of the pilot may have contributed to the inadvertent
stall. Conditions were conducive to carburettor icing. |
Injury profile: |
|
Total on board |
Fatal injuries |
Serious injuries |
Minor injuries |
Uninjured |
Injury severity not known |
Crew: |
1 |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Passengers: |
1 |
- |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
Aircraft total: |
2 |
1 |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
Ground: |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Resources & references: |
1. |
Accident
or Incident Report (New Zealand Transport
Accident Investigation Commi): TAIC 96-017. |
2. |
Accident
or Incident Report (New Zealand Civil
Aviation Authority): Accident Brief 96/2238. |
|
Date of event: |
07 June 1995. |
Location & aircraft: |
New Zealand,
Near Lake Grassmere.
Fletcher FU 24A-954 (ZK-EMU). |
Human Factors: |
Pilot incapacitation
was the probable cause of this accident. The incapacitation was sufficient to cause loss of situational awareness and loss
of aircraft control at a critical phase of flight. (See also similar accident at TAIC Report 95-018) |
Brief description of event: |
At approximately 1100
hours on Wednesday 7 June 1995 a Fletcher FU24A-954, ZK-EMU, collided with the face of a hill during a sowing run and caught
fire. The aircraft was destroyed, and the pilot lost his life in the accident. Pilot incapacitation was the probable cause
of this accident. The incapacitation was sufficient to cause loss of situational awareness and loss of aircraft control at
a critical phase of flight. No safety issues were identified as a result of this investigation.[A subsequent investigation
95-018 resulted in reference to this accident 95-010, and a recommendation 007/96] |
Injury profile: |
|
Total on board |
Fatal injuries |
Serious injuries |
Minor injuries |
Uninjured |
Injury severity not known |
Crew: |
1 |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Passengers: |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Aircraft total: |
1 |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Ground: |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Resources & references: |
|

Date of event: |
14 April 1991. |
Location & aircraft: |
New Zealand, Near Warkworth. Rotec Rally 3 Microlight (ZK-WAC). |
Human Factors: |
The loss of control
which led to the accident was probably caused by medical incapacitation of the pilot during the flight. The pilot suffered
from a medical condition which could cause incapacitation. The pilot's medical condition was probably discoverable by medical
examination. The prescribed medical certification process did not result in detection of the pilot's medical condition. The
pathological report disclosed that the pilot had severe coronary artery disease. The pilot was overweight and being treated
for high blood pressure. |
Brief description of event: |
Possible in-flight
incapacitation of the pilot of Rotec Rally 3, microlight aircraft ZK-WAC near Warkworth on 14 April 1991. The safety issues
discussed are the maintenance of a minimum fabric strength on microlight aircraft and measures for improving the monitoring
of microlight pilots' fitness to fly. |
Injury profile: |
|
Total on board |
Fatal injuries |
Serious injuries |
Minor injuries |
Uninjured |
Injury severity not known |
Crew: |
1 |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Passengers: |
1 |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Aircraft total: |
2 |
2 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Ground: |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Resources & references: |
|
Accident
or Incident Report (New Zealand Transport
Accident Investigation Commi): TAIC 91-011. |
|
Date of event: |
09 June 1990. |
Location & aircraft: |
New Zealand,
Near Claxby, Canterbury. Bantam B22 (ZK-FOM). |
Human Factors: |
Safety Recommendations:
More attention be paid to cardiovascular risk factors in asymptomatic individuals, in order to identify individuals with significant
vascular disease, before the risk of pilot incapacitation becomes excessive; That individuals with risk factors for cardiovascular
disease in particular be followed up on a regular basis according to age; That exercise ECGs may only be submitted to the
PMO if they are recorded after the patient has discontinued antihypertensive medication for an appropriate period, so that
a true maximal heart test can be achieved; That copies of all exercise ECG tracing should be submitted to the PMO and not
simply a report. |
Brief description of event: |
The aircraft was flying
into the wind at about 250 feet above ground level and had made several turns when it was observed to bank very steeply to
the left. It entered a steep spiral dive and shortly afterwards struck the ground. The instructor on board received fatal
injuries on impact. A student pilot who occupied the left seat died at Christchurch
Hospital later in the day from injuries sustained in the accident. |
Injury profile: |
|
Total on board |
Fatal injuries |
Serious injuries |
Minor injuries |
Uninjured |
Injury severity not known |
Crew: |
2 |
2 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Passengers: |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Aircraft total: |
2 |
2 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Ground: |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Resources & references: |
|
Accident
or Incident Report (New Zealand Transport
Accident Investigation Commi): TAIC 90-086. |
|
Date of event: |
07 February 1988. |
Location & aircraft: |
New Zealand, near Te Tipua. Quad City
Challenger II (ZK-RJX). |
Human Factors: |
Inability of the pilot's
medical examiners to detect a chronic disease which caused the sudden collapse or death of the pilot in flight. The accident
may have been caused by pilot medical incapacitation due to chronic sarcoidosis. There was no evidence that th pilot was aware
of his chronic sarcoidosis. |
Brief description of event: |
The aircraft was returning
to Gore Aerodrome from a private airstrip. A local farmer observed the aircraft pass over the property about 400 feet above
ground level, in normal cruising flight. Shortly afterwards it rolled to the left and entered a steep dive from which it was
not recovered. The two occupants received fatal injuries in the ensuing ground impact. The probable cause of this accident
was the inability of the pilot's medical examiners to detect a chronic disease which caused the sudden collapse or death of
the pilot in flight and resulted in the aircraft rolling to the left and entering an uncontrolled steep descent from which
it could not be reoverd by the rear seat occupant before it struck the ground. The significance of the weakened right rear
support strut for the horizontal tailplane, in relation to this accident, was not established. The possibility that the in-flight
failure of the strut occurred could not be ruled out. |
Injury profile: |
|
Total on board |
Fatal injuries |
Serious injuries |
Minor injuries |
Uninjured |
Injury severity not known |
Crew: |
1 |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Passengers: |
1 |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Aircraft total: |
2 |
2 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Ground: |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Resources & references: |
|
Accident
or Incident Report (NZ Transport Accident Investigation Commission): TAIC 88-014. |
|
Date of event: |
31 March 1975. |
Location & aircraft: |
New Zealand,
Waimate, South Canterbury. DH82A Tiger MOth (ZK-AKH). |
Human Factors: |
The accident resulted
from a stall and ensuing steep dive from which recovery was not effected before the aircraft struck the ground. Both incurrence
of that stall and absence of visible indications of an attempt to recover from that dive by a pilot of the deceased'd considerable
experience strongly suggests that he suffered some form of physical incapacitation productive of loss of control.Autopsy established
that the pilot had died in the fire and had been in good health prior to the accident, with the exception of a moderately
advanced calcific stenosis of the aortic valve of the heart. That heart condition had been recognised during the pilot's medical
examination for private pilot licence renewals from 1968 onward but evaluation by the civil aviation medical staff, aided
by routine electrocardiogram readings, resulted in opinion that the pilot's heart condition provided no bar to his fitness
to fly as a private pilot. |
Brief description of event: |
During formation flying,
with another Tiger Moth, the aircraft was seen to drop slowly astern and to lose height. The aircraft subsequently stalled
and entered a steep dive from which it did not recover. |
Injury profile: |
|
Total on board |
Fatal injuries |
Serious injuries |
Minor injuries |
Uninjured |
Injury severity not known |
Crew: |
1 |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Passengers: |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Aircraft total: |
1 |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Ground: |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Resources & references: |
|
Accident or Incident
Report (New Zealand Office of Air Accidents
Investigation,): OAAI 75-047. |
|
Date of event: |
06 December 1972. |
Location & aircraft: |
New Zealand,
Te Karaka, Poverty Bay.
DHC-2 Beaver (ZK-CZO). |
Human Factors: |
Investigation revealed
that the pilot suffered from three separate medical conditions, none of which was known to the regulatory authority but which,
had one or more of them been known, would have resulted at least in considerable increased health surveillance and probably
in an assessment of unfitness for flying duties.The probable cause of the accident was sudden physical incapacitation of the
pilot which resulted in his losing control of the aircraft and its consequent impact with the ground. |
Brief description of event: |
After suspension for
the day of topdressing operations near Te Karaka two DHC-2 Beaver aircraft were returning to base, Gisborne. The lead aircraft
was ZK-CSO, and was flown solo. When close to an area where the pilot of the lead aircraft had earlier completed a topdressing
job, he was seen by the occupants of the other aircraft to manoeuvre his aircraft in a manner suggesting that he wanted to
be followed so that a topdressing area that had already serviced might be observed. The pilot of the lead aircraft had initially
rocked his aircraft's wings laterally, then yawed the aircraft to port so that he could look rearward at the following aircraft
to see how closely it was following. Immediately after recovery from the yawed configuration, the aircraft rolled into a steep
turn to starboard, simultaneously assuming a dive which terminated in near-vertical impact with the ground. No apparent attempt
to recover from the dive was observed by the occupants of the other aircraft. The manoeuvre had started about 500ft above
some ridge tops. The aircraft was destroyed and the pilot lost his life. |
Injury profile: |
|
Total on board |
Fatal injuries |
Serious injuries |
Minor injuries |
Uninjured |
Injury severity not known |
Crew: |
1 |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Passengers: |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Aircraft total: |
1 |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Ground: |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Resources & references: |
|
Accident
or Incident Report (New Zealand Office
of Air Accidents Investigation,): OAAI 72-118. |
|

Date of event: |
24 December 1970. |
Location & aircraft: |
New Zealand,
Waitemata Harbour.
Grumman G44 Widgeon (ZK-BAY). |
Human Factors: |
The accident was caused
by loss of control (resulting from an undetermined circumstance) while the aircraft was in a steeply banked turn and at a
height below regulation minimum safe height, which made recovery impossible before the aircraft struck the sea.Autopsy revealed
50% atheromatous occlusion of the left cronary artery, but no evidence of complete occlusion. Whether or not control loss
resulted from an attack of angina pectoris brought on by stress must accordingly remain a matter for conjecture and cannot
be eliminated entirely as a possible contributory factor. |
Brief description of event: |
The aircraft was carrying
a TV news team to photograph a launch burning on the harbour near Brown's Island. It alighted
near the launch and then taxied around it several times whil photographs were taken, then took off and made a low pass around
the vessel while further pictures were taken. It was then seen to climb away and return to make a steep right-hand turn around
the launch. During that turn, the aircraft's nose was observed to drop suddenly and the aircraft dived almost vertically into
the sea. All four occupants lost their lives. |
Injury profile: |
|
Total on board |
Fatal injuries |
Serious injuries |
Minor injuries |
Uninjured |
Injury severity not known |
Crew: |
1 |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Passengers: |
3 |
3 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Aircraft total: |
4 |
4 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Ground: |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Resources & references: |
|
Accident
or Incident Report (New Zealand Office
of Air Accidents Investigation,): OAAI 2185. |
|
Date of event: |
06 June 1965. |
Location & aircraft: |
New Zealand, Whakatane Airfield. Grunau Baby glider (ZK-GDH). |
Human Factors: |
The accident was caused
by the sudden physical incapacity of the pilot, which resulted in his losing control of the glider during its flight. The
post mortem examination of the pilot's body found evidence of gross coronary atheroma, and microscopic examination of the
heart muscle showed that the pilot suffered from arteriosclerotic heart disease. The behaviour of the glider immediately prior
to the accident may be reconciled with the likely effects of a heart attack. There is no other apparent explanation for this
accident. Glider pilots are not required by regulation to undergo medical examination as a condition for the issue of their
certificates. |
Brief description of event: |
The glider was observed
to enter a vertical dive from an altitude of approximately 1,100ft. It recovered at about 500ft and, after flying a short
distance, entered a second dive which continued to the ground. The pilot was fatally injured. |
Injury profile: |
|
Total on board |
Fatal injuries |
Serious injuries |
Minor injuries |
Uninjured |
Injury severity not known |
Crew: |
1 |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Passengers: |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Aircraft total: |
1 |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Ground: |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Resources & references: |
|
Accident
or Incident Report (New Zealand Accidents
Investigation Branch, Depart): AIB 25/3/1539. |
|
Date of event: |
21 October 1963. |
Location & aircraft: |
New Zealand,
Owhakatoro Station, Taneatua, Bay of Plenty.
Fletcher FU-24 (ZK-BIN). |
Human Factors: |
For reasons which have
not been determined, the aircraft struck the ground in the course of a steep diving turn. Loss of control consequent upon
physical incapacitation of the pilot appears to be the most likely cause. Investigation made into the pilot's background pointed
toward a recent state of nervous tension, and it was learned that he had confided to a few intimate friends that he "was not
happy about his heart". Post mortem examination revealed no evidence of CO contamination, and there appeared to be no abnormality
which could have caused sudden incapacity. |
Brief description of event: |
In the course of a
topdressing operation the aircraft was seen to make a steep diving turn to starboard which took it into the ground. Fire did
not occur. The pilot was killed instantly. |
Injury profile: |
|
Total on board |
Fatal injuries |
Serious injuries |
Minor injuries |
Uninjured |
Injury severity not known |
Crew: |
1 |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Passengers: |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Aircraft total: |
1 |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Ground: |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Resources & references: |
|
Accident
or Incident Report (New Zealand Accidents
Investigation Branch, Air De): AIB 25/3/1361. |
|

Date of event: |
24 May 1961. |
Location & aircraft: |
Australia,
Brisbane airport. DC-4 freighter (VH-TAA). |
Human Factors: |
PIC died or collapsed
due to heart failure associated with myocarditis. |
Brief description of event: |
PIC (age 44) died or
collapsed due to heart failure associated with myocarditis on night visual final approach. He attempted to leave his seat
and fell across throttle quadrant knocking all throttle levers back to idle position. Crash fatal to copilot (only other occupant). |
Injury profile: |
|
Total on board |
Fatal injuries |
Serious injuries |
Minor injuries |
Uninjured |
Injury severity not known |
Crew: |
2 |
2 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Passengers: |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Aircraft total: |
2 |
2 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Ground: |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Date of event: |
12 January 2005. |
Location & aircraft: |
New Zealand, 11 nm South West Of Omarama. Rolladen Schneider LS1-F (ZK-GIX). |
Human Factors: |
The post-mortem examination
did not reveal any evidence of a pre-existing medical condition that could have resulted in incapacitation or affected the
pilot's ability to fly the glider, but there was evidence of Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) in the pilot's blood, which may have
compromised his fitness for flight. |
Brief description of event: |
The pilot was on a
private flight in the company of another glider, operating in the locality of Omarama. The conditions of the day indicated
that the pilot would be making use of thermals and some ridge soaring. The glider had struck the ridge, close to the summit,
in an approximately straight and level attitude. The wreckage of the glider was sighted within minutes of the accident, by
the accompanying glider. The first people to arrive at the accident scene found the pilot had been killed during the impact. |
Injury profile: |
|
Total on board |
Fatal injuries |
Serious injuries |
Minor injuries |
Uninjured |
Injury severity not known |
Crew: |
1 |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Passengers: |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Aircraft total: |
1 |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Ground: |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Resources & references: |
1. |
Media
release (New Zealand CAA press release): 21 March 2006. |
2. |
Accident
or Incident Report (New Zealand CAA Aircraft
Accident Report): 05/31. |
|
languages:
Status: |
Final |
Date: |
06 AUG 1997 |
Time: |
01:42 |
Type: |
Boeing 747-3B5 |
Operator: |
Korean Air |
Registration: |
HL7468 |
C/n / msn: |
22487/605 |
First flight: |
1984 |
Total airframe hrs: |
50105.0 |
Cycles: |
8552.0 |
Engines: |
4 Pratt & Whitney
JT9D-7R4G2 |
Crew: |
Fatalities: 22 / Occupants:
23 |
Passengers: |
Fatalities: 206 / Occupants:
231 |
Total: |
Fatalities: 228 / Occupants:
254 |
Airplane damage: |
Written off |
Location: |
4,8 km (3 mls) SW of
Guam-Agana International Airport (GUM) (Guam) |
Phase: |
Approach |
Nature: |
International Scheduled
Passenger |
Departure airport: |
Seoul-Gimpo (Kimpo) International Airport (SEL/RKSS), South Korea |
Destination airport: |
Guam-A.B. Won Pat International Airport (GUM/PGUM), Guam |
Flightnumber: |
801 |
Narrative: Korean Air
Flight 801 was a regular flight from Seoul to Guam. The Boeing
747-300 departed the gate about 21:27 and was airborne about 21:53. The captain was pilot-flying. Upon arrival to the Guam area, the first officer made initial contact with the Guam Combined Center/Radar Approach Control
(CERAP) controller about 01:03, when the airplane was level at 41,000 feet and about 240 nm northwest of the NIMITZ VOR/DME.
The CERAP controller told flight 801 to expect to land on runway 6L. About 01:10, the controller instructed flight 801 to
"...descend at your discretion maintain two thousand six hundred." The first officer responded, "...descend two thousand six
hundred pilot discretion." The captain then began briefing the first officer and the flight engineer about the approach
and landing at Guam: "I will give you a short briefing...ILS is one one zero three...NIMITZ VOR is one one five three, the
course zero six three, since the visibility is six, when we are in the visual approach, as I said before, set the VOR on number
two and maintain the VOR for the TOD [top of descent], I will add three miles from the VOR, and start descent when we're about
one hundred fifty five miles out. I will add some more speed above the target speed. Well, everything else is all right. In
case of go-around, since it is VFR, while staying visual and turning to the right...request a radar vector...if not, we have
to go to FLAKE...since the localizer glideslope is out, MDA is five hundred sixty feet and HAT [height above touchdown] is
three hundred four feet...." About 01:13 the captain said, "we better start descent;" shortly thereafter, the first officer
advised the controller that flight 801 was "leaving four one zero for two thousand six hundred." During the descent it appeared
that the weather at Guam was worsening. At 01:24 requested a deviation 10 miles to the left
to avoid severe weather. At 01:31 the first officer reported to the CERAP controller that the airplane was clear of cumulonimbus
clouds and requested "radar vectors for runway six left." The controller instructed the flight crew to fly a heading of 120°.
After this transmission, the flight crew performed the approach checklist and verified the radio frequency for the ILS to
runway 6L. About 01:38 the CERAP controller instructed flight 801 to "...turn left heading zero nine zero join localizer;"
the first officer acknowledged this transmission. At that time, flight 801 was descending through 2,800 feet msl with the
flaps extended 10° and the landing gear up. One minute later the controller stated, "Korean Air eight zero one cleared for
ILS runway six left approach...glideslope unusable." The first officer responded, "Korean eight zero one roger...cleared ILS
runway six left;" his response did not acknowledge that the glideslope was unusable. The flight engineer asked, "is the glideslope
working? glideslope? yeh?" One second later, the captain responded, "yes, yes, it's working." About 01:40, an unidentified
voice in the cockpit stated, "check the glideslope if working?" This statement was followed 1 second later by an unidentified
voice in the cockpit asking, "why is it working?" The first officer responded, "not useable." The altitude alert system chime
sounded and the airplane began to descend from an altitude of 2,640 feet msl at a point approximately 9 nm from the runway
6L threshold. About 01:40:22, an unidentified voice in the cockpit said, "glideslope is incorrect." As the airplane was descending
through 2,400 feet msl, the first officer stated, "approaching fourteen hundred." About 4 seconds later, when the airplane
was about 8 nm from the runway 6L threshold, the captain stated, "since today's glideslope condition is not good, we need
to maintain one thousand four hundred forty. please set it." An unidentified voice in the cockpit then responded, "yes." About
01:40:42, the CERAP controller instructed flight 801 to contact the Agana control tower. The first officer contacted the Agana
tower: "Korean air eight zero one intercept the localizer six left." The airplane was descending below 2,000 feet msl at a
point 6.8 nm from the runway threshold (3.5 nm from the VOR). About 01:41:01, the Agana tower controller cleared flight 801
to land. About 01:41:14, as the airplane was descending through 1,800 feet msl, the first officer acknowledged the landing
clearance, and the captain requested 30° of flaps. The first officer called for the landing checklist and at 01:41:33,
the captain said, "look carefully" and "set five hundred sixty feet" (the published MDA). The first officer replied "set,"
the captain called for the landing checklist, and the flight engineer began reading the landing checklist. About 01:41:42,
as the airplane descended through 1,400 feet msl, the ground proximity warning system (GPWS) sounded with the radio altitude
callout "one thousand [feet]." One second later, the captain stated, "no flags gear and flaps," to which the flight engineer
responded, "no flags gear and flaps." About 01:41:46, the captain asked, "isn't glideslope working?" The captain then stated,
"wiper on." About 01:41:53, the first officer again called for the landing checklist, and the flight engineer resumed reading
the checklist items. About 01:41:59, when the airplane was descending through 1,100 feet msl at a point about 4.6 nm from
the runway 6L threshold (approximately 1.3 nm from the VOR), the first officer stated "not in sight?" One second later, the
GPWS radio altitude callout sounded: "five hundred [feet]." About 01:42:14, as the airplane was descending through 840 feet
msl and the flight crew was performing the landing checklist, the GPWS issued a "minimums minimums" annunciation followed
by a "sink rate" alert about 3 seconds later. The first officer responded, "sink rate okay". At that time the airplane was
descending 1,400 feet per minute. About 01:42:19, as the airplane descended through 730 feet msl, the flight engineer stated,
"two hundred [feet]," and the first officer said, "let's make a missed approach." About one second later, the flight engineer
stated, "not in sight," and the first officer said, "not in sight, missed approach." About 01:42:22, as the airplane descended
through approximately 680 feet msl, the nose began to pitch up and the flight engineer stated, "go around." When the captain
stated "go around" power was added and airspeed began to increase. As the airplane descended through 670 feet msl, the autopilot
disconnect warning sounded. The GPWS radio altitude callouts continued: "one hundred...fifty...forty...thirty...twenty [feet]."
About 01:42:26, the airplane impacted hilly terrain at Nimitz Hill, Guam, about 660 feet msl and about 3.3 nm from the runway
6L -threshold. It struck trees and slid through dense vegetation before coming to rest. A post-impact fire broke out. It
was established a.o. that the software fix for the Minimum Safe Altitude Warning (MSAW) system at Agana Center Radar Approach
Control (CERAP) had rendered the program useless. A software patch had been installed since there had been complaints of the
high rate of false MSAW alarms at Guam. This made KAL801's descent below MDA go undetected at the Agana CERAP.
PROBABLE
CAUSE: "The captain's failure to adequately brief and execute the nonprecision approach and the first officer's and flight
engineer's failure to effectively monitor and cross-check the captain's execution of the approach. Contributing to these failures
were the captain's fatigue and Korean Air's inadequate flight crew training. Contributing to the accident was the Federal
Aviation Administration's intentional inhibition of the minimum safe altitude warning system and the agency's failure to adequately
to manage the system."
Sources:
Sample newspaper article from Newspaperarchive.com » ATC transcript Korean Air Flight 801 » Official Guam Crash Site Center - Korean Air
Flt 801 » NTSB Public hearing documents » Accident Investigation Report NTSB/AAR-00/01 [PDF ]
Statistics
28th
loss of a Boeing 747 9th worst accident involving a Boeing 747 (at the time) 9th worst accident
involving a Boeing 747 (currently) The worst accident in Guam (at the time) The worst accident in Guam (currently)
» figures explained

|
|
|
|
|
 |